WACKADOO-DOO
One poet, a friend of mine, has an annoying habit: He'll succeed in a half-baked sexual conquest--making out like a high-school boy in the parking lot of a barroom dive, whistling out a kiss when a train impedes automotive progress in the middle of a drunken drive homeward--and then he'll broadcast the entire scenario on his blog. The intent is simplistic: He's trying to create an image for himself. Inside, he's a man who's found plenty of compromise in his life to conquer--but he'll have none of that, won't deal with any of it, is content to rebel, rebel, and rebel until, someday, he'll be a white-haired rebel, stunned he's gone nowhere in his life. He may be immodest to a fault, but everyone's been so compassionate to him, he's been badly hurt by a marriage that imploded, is never ashamed to show it, and if any of his antics serve him well, we're happy for him. If he could spell, it might help. If he's ever bothered to read Strunk & Whites "The Elements of Style" or, God forbid, leafed through the Chicago Manual of Style, he certainly hasn't shown it. Though we do note here he believes spelling and punctuation is irrelevant. I hope his spelling and punctuation in bed is better than it is in his testimonies of bed. He even uses Latin phrases to introduce his blog, but he doesn't know any Latin, really; he can barely speak English. We know his short string of sexual conquest is really about his ego--trying to shore up his faulty self-image--and we usually give him a break. But how do the women who've been subjected to what amounts to a network simulcast of his kiss-and-tell routine feel about this? They probably like it--as long as he doesn't mention their names. If I was a woman and some guy wrote about me in lurid detail--the size of my tits, the texture of my skin, how I groaned when he shoved his big hand between my legs--I think I'd blanch. Regardless, we have to examine his audience. They're really not that sophisticated. That sort of exhibitionism in the name of false wisdom and ramshackle poetry is probably a fashion statement that turns some floozies on. Those of us who write simple lyrics about love, expressions of love, for some reason, sometimes end up branded as "dirty old men." What's that all about? Probably more simple posturing.
"One would not mistake true tenderness," the pre-revolutionary Russian poet, the young, mysterious and beautiful Anna Akhmatova, thinking perhaps of the more obvious aspects of tender-trap posturing from a suitor thinking his not-so-sincere advances were subtle and could be mistaken for meaningful, wrote in 1913.
Consequently, and I was telling a friend all about this one afternoon, the exhibitionism--the old spread-eagled display! display! in the jungleland of a barroom alcove--of for all intents and purposes a silver-back gorilla (I say this affectionately) has made me re-examine my own erotic poetry. I've written plenty of it: But I'm a little old school about my sentiments. A little like the ancient metaphysical poets, I believe that the most important experiences, especially those in the erotic arena, are best expressed by indirection: You make metaphors of the experiences, you stab at the meat, so to speak, obliquely, or, when the experience seems especially sacred, maintain your silence before the eyes of the world. The friend to whom I was speaking, by the way, is quite a gentleman in this respect: He doesn't kiss and tell. His sexual experiences with women--one woman in particular--he keeps a private matter. It's not that he's particularly concerned about embarrassing the woman--she's probably beyond embarrassment about her sex life anyway--it's that he sees erotic experience as a strictly private thing, something best left to the erotic experience itself. He never brags about how he shagged this woman, or teased that woman; no, he keeps his mouth shut. He's quite successful with his women.
"Man, I just think all that exhibitionistic stuff is so ridiculous," I told my friend.
"He's just a boy," my friend replied. "He's living in the way-back machine. Probably got shoved back into the high school hallways of his mind when his wife left him."
"Yeah," I replied. "He's like a big, giant bird: CHIRP!"
"Women would have to be utter fools to fall for that sort of thing. He thinks he's being so subtle."
"CHIRP! CHIRP-CHIRP!"
"By the way," I concluded, "how is she? I really worry about her sometimes. It really hurt when I realized our friendship had hit a dead-end. I'd call her to talk sometimes, she'd pull this dumb game one of her friends taught her and simply not call me back, so I quit calling her. I thought we were way beyond game-playing."
"Well, she's fine," he said. "I think she's really been working too much. Not making enough money either. She had to move--did you know that?"
"Yeah. I found that out by accident. I was trying to get hold of Joey one night and called her old telephone number. Discovered she'd moved. I'm sure she's not particularly happy about being forced to move from her favorite neighborhood to a place far north of where she was. When I called her, she sounded like she was miles away, a little girl really unhappy about certain developments. I felt like just fathering her. Yeah, she's got that hard exterior, but deep inside she's a sensitive and loving woman. But I'm sure you know that."
But I've managed to diverge from my commentary about sexual exhibitionism on the internet, now haven't I? Anyway, after that short conversation, I decided that I, too, could take my sexual conquests, recent and otherwise, and broadcast them to the world--you know, just to improve my "rep," whatever that's supposed to mean. It was quite a laugh-fest when I scrawled a particularly graphic episode of sexual licence, but it turned out fairly well. I wrote my other friend, the great big romeo, thought I'd ask for a little advice on the poem, considering he likes to style himself "the greatest poet of his generation." I thought I could follow in your footsteps, I wrote, or something along those lines, and here's a poem I wrote. Let me know what you think.
Huh? He never responded.
In fact, though the comment and the poem were posted by me on his blog, he, for one reason or another, decided it was perhaps too threatening to his own "rep" to even post it as a comment to one of his blog entries. I started laughing when I discovered his telling omission. I just couldn't help it. After all, I was writing to the great "expert." I was coming to the poetry-god on my knees. What did I get for my little prayer to Don Juan?
He ignored my little CHIRP. How friendly is that?
Well. I've got to respond in some way. I thought I'd use my blog to broadcast this testimony of one of my finest moments with a woman. I'm certain it will accomplish absolutely nothing--poetry is a useless contrivance anyway--but I hope readers who stumble upon this message in a bottle enjoy what they see.
O God of Sex! Goddesses of the Erotic! Little muses everywhere! I'm such a man! Applaud to me, admire me from afar, send gestures and smiles to me from your seat in the audience. Oooooh...sooooo...dangerous....! Remember, though: The next one could be about you. And this was such a long, long, long, long poem....And Christi? Sorry about the pantie-hose. Did the excitement you needed after your divorce merit the cost? Mmmmmm...so expensive...so rich...so smooth...tawny...wet nylon...the surface of a deep lake...dappled with rain in the spring...little heart....